As the sale proce s of the Phoenix Coyotes moves closer to a hopeful conclusion with former Sharks CEO Greg Jamison, more details keep being made public.The latest came in the release of the potential deal with Jamison from the city of Glendale, which is getting ready to present the plan to the City Council. As expected, it involves a lot of money going from the city to the team/arena for the upkeep. Here is a : The NHL team stays in Glendale for 20 years, the same amount of time remaining on the original bonds for the arena. The NHL team continues to pay rent for use of the city-owned arena, approximately $13 million over the term of the lease. The city will continue to receive a ticket surcharge on every ticket sold for events at the arena, estimated to be approximately $60 million over the life of the lease.There are some other details in there as well, a few extra ways the city gets some money back Jared Koenig Jersey -- including arena naming rights and sales tax generated from hosting events.Then there is one extra twist from The name change would make plenty of sense since the Coyotes haven't been in Phoenix for years now. You'll remember this happened just this summer in baseball when the Florida Marlins moved near downtown and changed the name to the Miami Marlins. Since Glendale Coyotes doesn't exactly pop, they'd look for the Coyotes to join the Diamondbacks and Cardinals in taking the state name instead of the city.But back to the deal. If you average the money out, that's $15 million per year from the city of Glendale before you factor in the additional $24 million for the capital funding. Compare that to the $13 million in 20 seasons and the additional funds racking up and you see the city giving up a lot. However, they don't believe this will be an i sue with the Goldwater Institution, which has threatened to sue the team over a previous potential deal. The proposal explains that in stating why the city would invest so much.1. Meets the constitutional test against gifting by the city.2. The financial position for the city with the team in place will be better than managing the arena without the team.3. This conclusion was arrived at without the inclusion of any revenue from the Westgate development, which is expected to at least double over the life of the teams stay.No. 2 has to be the key selling point. The investment might seem like a lot until you consider what it will cost them without a tenant. Those extra income outlets get them at least something back in return. Now that we have the framework being released, a deal presumably shouldn't be that far off. That's without another snag in the proce s, of course. Bryan Hudson Jersey